GAYA KOMUNIKASI YANG EFEKTIF PADA LINGKUNGAN ORGANISASI PUBLIK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53625/jpdsh.v1i9.2738Keywords:
Communication style, organizational environment, communication effectiveness, service diversityAbstract
Different communication styles in the organizational environment can hinder the quality of public service performance. The diversity of services that must be provided by office employees at the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Pattimura University from students, lecturers, education staff forms a variety of communication patterns. The research method used in this research is descriptive quantitative by distributing question sheets to students and lecturers to measure effective communication style. Research findings related to (1). employee effectiveness (Y) 0.691, (2). The organizational communication dimension (Y) is 0.721. (3). The Effectiveness of Employee Work Communication (Y) is 0.704 (70.4%). So it can be concluded that the maximum embodiment of Organizational Communication Effectiveness is at the Faculty of Social
References
Ambar. (2017). Komunikasi Asentif Yang Efektif-Pengertian dan Tekniknya (pakarkomunikasi.com/komuniasi-esentif) di akses pada 10 Maret 2022.
Cook, Curtis W, and Hunsaker L, Phillip, (2001). Management and Organizational Behavior, Third Edition, Mc Graw- Hill, Irwin, Boston Burr Ridge, New York San Francisco.
De Ridder dan Van den Hoof, 2004. Creating Knowledge Organizational and Using Communication Technology. Londo: Sage.
Gibb R. Jack, 1961, Devensive Communication, Journal of Communication, Volume 11 Issue 3 Pages 141-148 First published: September 1961, Citations: 25 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1961.tb00344.x
Frank, A. and Brownell, J. (1989) Organizational Communication and Behaviour: Communicating to Improve Performance. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Orlando.
Selanno, H., & Wance, M. (2021). PERFORMANCE OF INSPECTORATE IN SUPERVISION OF GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION IN BURU SELATAN REGENCY. Sosiohumaniora, 23(2), 189-157.
Handoko, T., Hani, 1998, Manajemen dan Sumber Daya Manusia, Yogyakarta, Liberty.
Herizal, H., Mukhrijal, M., & Wance, M. (2020). Pendekatan akuntabilitas pelayanan publik dalam mengikuti perubahan paradigma baru administrasi publik. Journal of Governance and Social Policy, 1(1), 24-34.
Koontz, H; Cyril O’Donnel; dan Heinz Weihrich. 1991. Manajemen. Erlangga.
Jakarta.
Price Arnould, & Zinkhan, 2005. Consumers, 2nd Edition. McGraw – Hill.
Pace, R Wayne dan Faules Don F. 2006. Komunikasi Organisasi. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Reinout E. de Vries Bart van den Hooff (2006). Explaining Knowledge Sharing The Role of Team Communication Styles, Job Satisfaction, and Performance Beliefs
Riduwan, 2003. Dasar-Dasar Statistika, Bandung : Alfabeta.
Saputra, 2000, Komunikasi Organisasi Publik, Jakarta : OKP Karya Pemuda.
Simon, 1982, Perilaku Organisasi, (Alih Bahasa : Dianjung), Jakarta: Penerbit Bina Aksara.
Sugiyono. 2010. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Saputra, 2000, Komunikasi Organisasi Publik, Jakarta : OKP Karya Pemuda.
Sudjana, Nana. 2004. Dasar-dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung :Sinar Baru Algensido Offset.
Marquis, B.L. & Huston, C.J. (2003). Leadership roles and management function in nursing:teory & application. (4th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott William &Wilkins.
Moh, Nasir. 2003. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia
Wance, M. (2019). Evaluasi Pelayanan Kinerja pada Badan Kesatuan Bangsa dan Politik Kota Ternate Tahun 2017. Kolaborasi: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 5(1), 46-62.
Wahyuni Lili, 2009, “Pengaruh Komunikasi Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Bagian Akuntansi dengan Komitmen Organisasi dan Tekanan Pekerjaan Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan BUMN di Provinsi Sumatera Barat)”, Program Studi Magister Akuntansi Program Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro.
Wance, M. (2022). Kualitas Pelayanan Pengelolaan Sampah Masyarakat Di Kota Ambon. Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani, 2(2), 587-598.
