EFFECT OF WORK ENVIRONMENT ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION WITH WORK COMMUNICATION AS INTERVENING VARIABLE

Authors

  • Rumiris Siahaan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Bina Karya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53625/joel.v1i7.1532

Keywords:

work environment, work communication, and job satisfaction

Abstract

This research shows. (1) It can be seen that the adjusted R square value is 0.586 or 58.6%. This shows that work communication (Z) and work environment (X) can explain job satisfaction (Y) by 58.6%, the remaining 41.4% (100% - 58.6%) is explained by other variables outside the model. this research. (2) The results of the t-test (partial) can be seen that the obtained tcount (7.526) > ttable (2.028), as well as the significance value of 0.00 <0.05, it can be concluded that the first hypothesis is accepted, meaning that the work environment variable (X) positive and significant effect on work communication (Z). (3) The results of the t-test (partial) can be seen that the value of tcount (3.034) > ttable (2.028), and the significance value of 0.005 <0.05, it can be concluded that the second hypothesis is accepted, meaning that the work environment (X) has a significant effect on job satisfaction. (Y). (4) The results of the path analysis test show that the direct effect of variable X on variable Y is 0.515. Meanwhile, the indirect effect through the Z variable is 0.782 x 0.309 = 0.241. From the calculation results obtained, the indirect effect through the Z variable is greater than the direct effect on the Y variable.

References

Arif, S. 2018. Human Resource Management. PT. Youth Rosda Karya, Bandung.

Arnold. 2011. Leadership, Enhancing the Lessons of Experience, Translated:

Putri Devito. Jakarta. Desseller, Gary. 2013. Human Resource Management (Fourteenth Edition). Salemba Empat Jakarta.

Hasibuan, 2014, Human Resource Management. Revised Edition. Publisher PT Bumi Aksara Jakarta .2016. Human Resource Management. Revised Edition. Publisher PT Bumi Aksara Jakarta

Handoko 2017. Human Resource Management. Revised Edition. Aswaja Pressindo Jakarta Hidayah, 2016. Human Resource Management. Erlangga. Jakarta

Ghozali, Imam. 2011. "Application of Multivariate Analysis With SPSS Program" Diponegoro University Publishing Agency. Semarang

Riswandi. 2011. Management and Employee Performance Evaluation. : Publisher Aswaja Pressindo. Yogyakarta.

Nazir, Moh. 2013. “Research Methods”. Indonesian Ghalia. Bogor

Nawawi, 2012. Personnel Management and Human Resources. Yogyakarta

Sugiyono. 2012. "Business Research Methodology", Print 16.

Alphabeta. Bandung , 2013. "Quantitative, Qualitative and R&D Research Methods". Alphabeta.CV. Bandung. , 2015. Understanding qualitative research. Bandung ,2016. Research Methods Quantitative, Qualitative, R&D. Bandung:

Alphabet Veithzal Rivai 2014. "Human Resource Management.: SALEMBA FOUR." Jakarta Soedarmayanti. Wulan, 2010. Human Resource Management.: Bumi Aksara, Jakarta

Sutrisno, Edy. 2015. Human Resource Management (seventh issue). Kencana Prenada Media Group Jakarta

Richard, Gordon. 2011 Analysis of Organizational Performance Measurement With the Balanced Scorecard Method. Journal of Social and Political Diponegoro. Semarang.

Mulyana.2010, Human Resource Management for Companies: from Theory to Practice, Jakarta Wahjono, 2010. Human Resource Management. Media Library Jakarta.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-23

How to Cite

Rumiris Siahaan. (2022). EFFECT OF WORK ENVIRONMENT ON EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION WITH WORK COMMUNICATION AS INTERVENING VARIABLE. JOEL: Journal of Educational and Language Research, 1(7), 987–1002. https://doi.org/10.53625/joel.v1i7.1532

Issue

Section

Articles