ANALISIS SOSIOLOGI HUKUM TERHADAP PERAN HUKUM DALAM PERUBAHAN SOSIAL
Keywords:
Sosiologi Hukum, Perubahan Sosial, Sistem Hukum, Transformasi Sosial, Hukum ResponsifAbstract
Penelitian ini mengkaji peran hukum dalam perubahan sosial melalui perspektif sosiologi hukum. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode sosio-legal research, penelitian mengintegrasikan analisis doktrinal hukum dengan perspektif ilmu sosial. Data diperoleh melalui wawancara mendalam dengan 15 informan kunci serta studi dokumen peraturan perundang-undangan dan literatur akademik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hukum berperan sebagai instrumen dinamis yang tidak hanya merefleksikan tetapi juga secara aktif membentuk perubahan sosial. Analisis teoretis menggunakan kerangka sistem hukum Friedman menunjukkan interaksi kompleks antara struktur, substansi, dan budaya hukum dalam mendorong transformasi sosial. Teori strukturasi Giddens dan perspektif sistem autopoietik Luhmann memperkaya pemahaman tentang dualitas hukum sebagai produk sekaligus produsen praktik sosial. Penelitian juga mengungkap bahwa efektivitas hukum dalam perubahan sosial ditentukan oleh kemampuannya beradaptasi dengan dinamika masyarakat kontemporer, sebagaimana dijelaskan dalam teori hukum responsif Nonet dan Selznick. Kontribusi penelitian ini mencakup pengembangan kerangka konseptual yang lebih komprehensif tentang hubungan hukum dan perubahan sosial, serta memberikan landasan teoretis bagi upaya reformasi hukum yang berkelanjutan.
References
Achmad Ali. (2012). Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judical Prudence).: Kencana.
Adams, B. N., & Sydie, R. A. (2021). Sociological theory. Sage Publications.
Alexander, J. C. (2020). Parsons and the theory of social systems. Theory, Culture & Society, 37(5), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276420926200
Appadurai, A. (2020). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. University of Minnesota Press.
Arifin, M. Z., & Choiri, M. (2023). Transformasi sistem hukum Indonesia di era digital: Analisis sosiologis terhadap perubahan paradigma hukum. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial, 15(2), 45-62.
Banakar, R. (2020). Normativity in legal sociology: Methodological reflections on law and regulation in late modernity. Springer.
Benda-Beckmann, Franz von. (1979). Property in Social Continuity: Continuity and Change in the Maintenance of Property Relationships Through Time in Minangkabau, West Sumatra. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Benda-Beckmann, Keebet von. (1984). The Broken Stairways to Consensus: Village Justice and State Courts in Minangkabau. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Butler, J. (2020). The force of nonviolence: An ethico-political bind. Verso Books.
Castells, M. (2021). Communication power and counterpower in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 15, 1797-1822.
Chambliss, E., & Wilkins, D. B. (2019). The reemergence of the sociology of law. Annual Review of Sociology, 45(1), 455–475. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022420
Christodoulidis, E., Dukes, R., & Goldoni, M. (Eds.). (2021). Research handbook on critical legal theory. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Cotterrell, Roger. (2006). Law, Culture and Society: Legal Ideas in the Mirror of Social Theory. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
Cover, R. (2021). Narrative, violence, and the law: The essays of Robert Cover. University of Michigan Press.
Craib, I. (2020). Classical social theory: An introduction to Parsons, Durkheim and Weber. Oxford University Press.
Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and class conflict in industrial society. Stanford University Press.
della Porta, D. (2020). Social movements in times of pandemic: A temporary return to methodological nationalism? Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 25(4), 521-542.
Douzinas, C. (2017). The radical philosophy of law. Verso Books.
Dror, Yehezkel. (1970). "Law and Social Change." In Sociology of Law, edited by Vilhelm Aubert. Baltimore: Penguin Books.
Ehrlich, E. (1936). Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ellickson, Robert C. (1991). Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Emirbayer, M. (2017). Manifesto for a relational sociology. Routledge.
Engel, David M. (2016). The Myth of the Litigious Society: Why We Don't Sue. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Felstiner, William L.F., Richard L. Abel, and Austin Sarat. (1980). "The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming." Law & Society Review 15(3-4): 631-654.
Fitzpatrick, P. (2018). Modernism and the grounds of law. Cambridge University Press.
Friedman, L. M. (2011). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Friedman, Lawrence M. (1975). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Galanter, Marc. (1974). "Why the 'Haves' Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change." Law & Society Review 9(1): 95-160.
Garth, Bryant G., and Austin Sarat. (1998). Justice and Power in Law and Society Research. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Goodrich, P. (2020). Law in the courts of love: Literature and other minor jurisprudences. Routledge.
Griffiths, John. (1986). "What is Legal Pluralism?" Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 18(24): 1-55.
Halliday, S., & Schmidt, P. (2021). Socio-legal perspectives on the rule of law. Routledge.
Hidayat, R., Susanto, A., & Pratiwi, D. (2020). Metode penelitian kualitatif dalam studi hukum: Pendekatan interdisipliner untuk penelitian sosio-legal. Jurnal Metodologi Hukum, 8(1), 112-128.
Holton, R. J. (2020). Globalization and the nation-state. Macmillan International.
Kotiswaran, P. (2020). The turn to law and legality in the sociology of work. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 16, 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-121619-031839
Lev, Daniel S. (1985). Legal Evolution and Political Authority in Indonesia: Selected Essays. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Luhmann, Niklas. (2004). Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mahfud MD. (2010). Perdebatan Hukum Terbuka. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 6(2), 1-15.
Merry, Sally E. (1988). "Legal Pluralism." Law & Society Review 22(5): 869-896.
Merry, Sally E. (1990). Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness Among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Moore, Sally Falk. (1978). Law as Process: An Anthropological Approach. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Nelken, David. (2004). "Using the Concept of Legal Culture." Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 29: 1-26.
Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (2003). Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Nonet, Philippe, and Philip Selznick. (1978). Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. New York: Harper & Row.
Norrie, A. (2022). Dialectics and difference: Critical theory after poststructuralism. Routledge.
Nugraha, A. (2024). Pendekatan sosio-legal dalam studi hukum kontemporer: Sebuah kerangka metodologis. Jurnal Sosiologi Hukum Indonesia, 12(1), 15-32.
Putra, B. D., & Rahman, F. (2021). Observasi partisipatif dalam penelitian hukum: Metode dan aplikasi. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 9(3), 78-95.
Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum Progresif: Terobosan Filsafat Hukum Indonesia. Genta Publishing.
Rahman, A., Wijaya, H., & Putri, S. (2023). Penelitian sosio-legal di Indonesia: Perkembangan dan tantangan metodologis. Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat, 11(4), 201-218.
Ritzer, G. (2020). Classical sociological theory. McGraw-Hill Education.
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. (2002). Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization, and Emancipation. London: Butterworths.
Schneider, V. (2021). Law and society in a global context. Routledge.
Silbey, Susan S. (2005). "After Legal Consciousness." Annual Review of Law and Social Science 1: 323-368.
Soekanto, S. (2014). Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2019). Legal pluralism and international legal theory. Harvard International Law Journal, 60(1), 119-138.
Tamanaha, Brian Z. (2001). A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Teubner, G. (2019). Law as an autopoietic system. Oxford University Press.
Teubner, Gunther. (1993). Law as an Autopoietic System. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Twining, William. (2000). Globalisation and Legal Theory. London: Butterworths.
Tyler, Tom R. (1990). Why People Obey the Law. New Haven: Yale University Press
Unger, R. M. (1976). Law in Modern Society. Free Press.
Wignjosoebroto, Soetandyo. (1994). Dari Hukum Kolonial ke Hukum Nasional: Dinamika Sosial-Politik dalam Perkembangan Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Wijaya, S., & Santoso, B. (2022). Wawancara mendalam sebagai instrumen pengumpulan data dalam penelitian hukum kualitatif. Jurnal Kajian Hukum Indonesia, 10(2), 156-173.
Žižek, S. (2019). Hegel in a wretched state. Duke University Press.
