VALIDITAS PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN BIOLOGI BERBASIS STEAM UNTUK MELATIH KETERAMPILAN ABAD KE-21 SISWA SMA
Keywords:
Keterampilan Abad 21, Pembelajaran Biologi, Perangkat Pembelajaran, STEAM, ValiditasAbstract
Perangkat pembelajaran biologi penting digunakan untuk mengembangkan keterampilan abad ke-21 siswa dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan isu-isu global. Untuk itu penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan perangkat pembelajaran biologi berbasis STEAM. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk memvalidasi perangkat pembelajaran yang dikembangkan adalah lembar validasi untuk expert judgment. Hasil menunjukan bahwa perolehan rata-rata persentase dari ahli materi sebesar 95,99% , ahli desain pembelajaran sebesar 97,22%, dan praktisi pendidikan sebesar 96,57%. Hasil uji empiris menunjukan bahwa instrument penilaian valid dan reliabel. Berdasarkan hasil tersebut maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa perangkat pembelajaran yang dihasilkan tergolong sangat valid sehingga dapat diimplentasikan lebih lanjut
References
Adilah, Maulida Mar’atu, and Suliyanah. “Validitas Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Dengan Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving (CPS) Untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif.” Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika 09, no. 02 (2020): 111-. https://www.golder.com/insights/block-caving-a-viable-alternative/.
Amtiningsih, Septi, Sri Dwiastuti, and Dewi Sari Puspita. “Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Melalui Penerapan Guided Inquiry Dipadu Brainstorming Pada Materi Pencemaran Air Improving Creative Thinking Ability through Guided Inquiry Combined Brainstorming Application in Material of Water Pollution.” In Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 13:868–872, 2016.
Ashudik, Prafselia Citra, and Bertha Yonata. “Jurusan Kimia, FMIPA Universitas Negeri Surabaya.” Unesa Journal Chemical education 7, no. 31 (2018): 399–406.
Bariyah, Lailatul. “Analisis Kesesuaian RPP Dan Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Guru SMPN Di Kabupaten Mojokerto Pada Sub Materi Fotosintesis Dengan Kerikulum 2013.” BioEdu 3, no. 3 (2014): 453–460.
Contreras, Karen, Claudia Arredondo, Claudio Díaz, María Jesús Inostroza, and Brandee Strickland. “Examining Differences between Pre- and in-Service Teachers’ Cognition When Lesson Planning.” System 91 (2020): 102240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102240.
Education Technology Division Ministry of Education. Project-Based Learning Handbook “Educating the Millenial Learner.” First. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education, 2006.
Halimatul, Iim, and Ipin Aripin. “IMPLEMENTASI STEM DALAM PEMBELAJARAN ABAD 21,” no. 2012 (2019): 1495–1503.
Hu, Zhen, Jae Woo Lee, Kartik Chandran, Sungpyo Kim, Keshab Sharma, and Samir Kumar Khanal. “Influence of Carbohydrate Addition on Nitrogen Transformations and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Intensive Aquaculture System.” Science of the Total Environment 470–471, no. 3 (2014): 193–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.050.
Jefriadi, J., Y. Ahda, and R. Sumarmin. “Validity of Students Worksheet Based Problem-Based Learning for 9th Grade Junior High School in Living Organism Inheritance and Food Biotechnology.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 335, no. 1 (2018).
Johnston, R. B. “Arsenic and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.” Arsenic Research and Global Sustainability - Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Arsenic in the Environment, AS 2016.
Krathwhol, David R. “A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview.” Theory Into Practice 41, no. 4 (2002): 219–225.
Liao, Christine. “From Interdisciplinary to Transdisciplinary: An Arts-Integrated Approach to STEAM Education.” Art Education 69, no. 6 (2016): 44–49.
Makhrus, Muhammad, Ahmad Harjono, Abdul Bahri Syukur, and Syamsul Muntari. “Identifikasi Kesiapan LKPD Guru Terhadap Keterampilan Abad 21 Pada Pembelajaran IPA SMP.” Jurnal Ilmiah Profei Pendidikan 3, no. 2 (2018): 124–128.
Megawanti, Priarti. “Permasalahan Pendidikan Dasar Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA 2, no. 3 (2012): 227–234.
Muhlisin, Ahmad. “Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Ipa Terpadu Berbasis Contextual Teaching and Learning (Ctl) Dengan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Teams Achievement Division (Stad) Tema Polusi Udara.” Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation 1, no. 2 (2012): 139–145.
Nahdliyati, R., Permin, and M. Taufiq. “Efektivitas Pendekatan Saintifik Dengan Model Project Based Learning Tema Ekosistem Untuk Menumbuhkan Kemandirian Belajar Siswa Smp.” USEJ - Unnes Science Education Journal 5, no. 2 (2016): 1227–1234.
Nuraini, Nuraini, Makrina Tindangen, and Elsje Theodora Maasawet. “Analisis Permasalahan Guru Terkait Perangkat Pembelajaran Berbasis Model Inquiry Dan Permasalahan Siswa Terkait Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Di Sma.” Jurnal Pendidikan - Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan 1, no. 10 (2016): 2066–2070.
Nuryani, Pupun, Yunus Abidin, and Yusuf Tri Herlambang. “Model Pedagogik Multiliterasi Dalam Mengembangkan Keterampilan Berpikir Abad Ke-21.” EduHumaniora | Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Kampus Cibiru 11, no. 2 (2019): 117–126.
O’Leary, Sean. “The Inclusive Classroom: Effect of a Readability Intervention on Student Engagement and On-Task Behaviour within Two Mixed-Ability Science Classrooms.” Science Education International 22, no. 2 (2011): 145–151. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ941676&site=eost-live.
Oren, Fatma Sasmaz, and Ummuhan Ormanci. “An Application about Pre-Service Teachers’ Development and Use of Worksheets and an Evaluation of Their Opinions about the Application.” Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri 12, no. 1 (2012): 241–270.
Parkes, Jay, and Mary B. Harris. “The Purposes of a Syllabus.” College Teaching 50, no. 2 (2002): 55–61.
Partnership for 21st Century learning. “21st CENTURY STUDENT OUTCOMES.” Last modified 2015. http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework.
Rahman, Md. Mehadi. “21st Century Skill ‘Problem Solving’: Defining the Concept.” Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research 2, no. 1 (2019): 71–81.
Sari, Wahyu Permata, Ramadhan Sumarmin, and Dwi Putri Hilda. “Validity of Biology Student Work Sheet Based on Problem Based Learning for Student Class XI.” International Journals of Sciences and High Technologies Vol. 7 (1), no. 1 (2018): 25–30.
Siburian, Jodion, Aloysius Duran Corebima, Ibrohim, and Murni Saptasari. “The Correlation between Critical and Creative Thinking Skills on Cognitive Learning Results.” Eurasian Journal of Educational Research 2019, no. 81 (2019): 99–114.
Slattery, Jeanne M., and Janet F. Carlson. “Preparing An Effective Syllabus: Current Best Practices.” College Teaching 53, no. 4 (2005): 159–164.
Tanjung, Henra Saputra, and Siti Aminah Nababan. “Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Berorientasi Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah ( PBM ) Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA Se-Kuala Nagan Raya Aceh.” Genta Mulia 9, no. 2 (2018): 56–70.
Tokatli, A. Mine, and Yeşim Keşli. “Syllabus:How Much Does It Contribute to the Effective Communication with the Students?” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 1, no. 1 (2009): 1491–1494.
Widoyoko, E.P. Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Penilaian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, n.d.
Wijaya, Etistika Yuni, Dwi Agus Sudjimat, and Amat Nyoto. “Transformasi Pendidikan Abad 21 Sebagai Tuntutan.” In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika 2016, 1:263–278, 2016. http://repository.unikama.ac.id/840/32/263-278 TRANSFORMASI PENDIDIKAN ABAD 21 SEBAGAI TUNTUTAN PENGEMBANGAN SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA DI ERA GLOBAL.pdf. diakses pada; hari/tgl; sabtu, 3 November 2018. jam; 00:26, wib.
Zubaidah, Siti. “Keterampilan Abad Ke-21: Keterampilan Yang Diajarkan Melalui Pembelajaran.” Seminar Nasional Pendidikan 2, no. 2 (2016): 1–17. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Siti_Zubaidah5/publication/318013627_KETERAMPILAN_ABAD_KE-21_KETERAMPILAN_YANG_DIAJARKAN_MELALUI_PEMBELAJARAN/links/5954c8450f7e9b2da1b3a42b/KETERAMPILAN-ABAD-KE-21-KETERAMPILAN-YANG-DIAJARKAN-MELALUI-PEMBELAJARAN.pdf.
Zulyadaini, Dr. “A Development of Students’ Worksheet Based on Contextual Teaching and Learning.” IOSR Journal of Mathematics 13, no. 01 (2017): 30–38.
