THE EFFECT OF SAVINGS AND OPERATIONAL COSTS ON THE REST OF THE VILLAGE ECONOMIC BUSINESS SHU – SAVES (UD-SP) SIMPANG KOTA MEDAN, KELAYANG DISTRICT, INDRAGIRI HULU REGENCY

Authors

  • Yuda Remofa Lecturer STIE Indragiri Rengat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53625/jirk.v2i1.3295

Keywords:

Saving, Operational Cost, Residual Income.

Abstract

From the results of the study, the regression equation obtained is Y = 93,419 + 4.828X1 - 0,059X2, it can be seen that savings and operational costs have a positive influence on the remaining operating results (UED-SP) Village Economy - Savings and Loans (UED-SP) Simpang Medan City Kelayang District, Indragiri Hulu Regency. In addition, the simultaneous test (F test), has obtained F count > F table that is equal to 23,788 > 19.00. So that the two independent variables, namely savings and operational costs, have a positive and significant effect on the dependent variable, namely the residual income (UED-SP) of Village Economy - Savings and Loans (UED-SP) Simpang Medan City, Kelayang District, Indragiri Hulu Regency. While the Partial Regression Test (t test) shows that the savings variable that has a significant effect on the remaining operating income (UED-SP) of Village Economy - Savings and Loans (UED-SP) Simpang Medan City, Kelayang District, Indragiri Hulu Regency, namely t count > t table of 3,395 > 3.18245. While the operational cost variable has no significant effect on the remaining operating income (UED-SP) of Village Economics - Savings and Loans (UED-SP) Simpang Medan City, Kelayang District, Indragiri Hulu Regency, namely t count > t table of -0.646 < -3.18245. In addition, the results of the multiple correlation coefficient is 0.889 which indicates the level of relationship between all independent variables to the dependent variable in this study is in the criteria of a strong relationship. The magnitude of the influence caused by these two variables together affects the remaining operating results variable with a percentage of 79.1%. While 20.9% is influenced by other factors that are not involved in this study

References

Adisaputra, Gunawan. 2008. Anggaran Perusahaan. BPFE.Yogyakarta

Anoraga, Pandji dan Widiyanti, Ninik. 2007. Dinamika Koperasi. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta

Ghozali, Imam. 2007. Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Edisi Kelima. Universitas Ponegoro. Semarang

Latifah, Nurul. 2006. Akuntansi untuk Koperasi Simpan Pinjam atau Unit Simpan Pinjam. Volume 1.

Muljono, Djoko. 2012. Buku Pintar Strategi Bisnis Koperasi Simpan Pinjam. Yogyakarta: Andi

Nafarin, M. 2007. Penganggaran Perusahaan. Salemba Empat. Jakarta.

Nasution, Muslimin. 2008. Koperasi Menjawab Kondisi Ekonomi Nasional. PIP. Jakarta.

Subagyo, A. 2014. Manajemen Koperasi Simpan Pinjam. Mitra Wacana Media. Jakarta.

Subandi. 2009. Ekonomi Koperasi Teori dan Praktik. Alfabeta. Bandung

Sudarwanto, Adenk. 2013. Akuntansi Koperasi. Graha Ilmu. Yogyakarta.

Syahrial, Dermawan, 2007, Pengantar Manajemen Keuangan, Edisi 2, Jakarta: Mitra Wecana Media

Trisnawati, Tuti. 2009. Ekonomi koperasi dalam teori dan praktek, Salemba Empat. Bandung.

Umar, Husein. 2009. Metode Penelitian untuk Skripsi dan Thesis Bisnis, Edisi Kedua Cetakan Keempat. Penerbit PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.

Undang-Undang No. 25 Tahun 1992, Penerbit BPFE-UGM. Yoyakarta

Downloads

Published

2022-08-22

How to Cite

Yuda Remofa. (2022). THE EFFECT OF SAVINGS AND OPERATIONAL COSTS ON THE REST OF THE VILLAGE ECONOMIC BUSINESS SHU – SAVES (UD-SP) SIMPANG KOTA MEDAN, KELAYANG DISTRICT, INDRAGIRI HULU REGENCY. Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 2(1), 317–322. https://doi.org/10.53625/jirk.v2i1.3295

Issue

Section

Articles