Feedback Environment sebagai Prediktor Psychological Well-Being Generasi Z di PT Altrak 1978 Karang Joang
Keywords
feedback environment, Generasi Z, karyawan, psychological well-beingAbstract
Psychological well-being is an important aspect of employees' functioning in the workplace, particularly among Generation Z employees who are adapting to changing work demands and organizational environments. One workplace factor that may be associated with psychological well-being is the feedback environment, which reflects employees' perceptions of feedback received through interactions with supervisors and coworkers. This study aims to examine feedback environment as a predictor of psychological well-being among Generation Z employees at PT Altrak 1978 Karang Joang. The study employed a quantitative approach with a correlational design. Participants were 108 Generation Z employees selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected using the short version of the Feedback Environment Scale (FES) adapted from Louro and Gabardo-Martins (2024) and the Psychological Well-Being Scale adapted in the Indonesian context by Humaidah and Mulyono (2025). Data were analyzed using simple linear regression with the assistance of SPSS version 26. The results showed that feedback environment significantly predicted psychological well-being (p = .019). The correlation coefficient was R = .226, indicating a weak relationship, while the coefficient of determination was R² = .051, indicating that feedback environment explained 5.1% of the variance in psychological well-being. These findings indicate that feedback environment is one workplace factor associated with psychological well-being among Generation Z employees, although other factors also contribute to psychological well-being.
References
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
Dudija, N., & Apriliansyah, M. D. (2024). Psychological well-being among Generation Z employees: A literature review. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 12(8), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v12i08.gp01
Dumitriu, S., Bocean, C. G., Antoaneta, A., & Al-floarei, A. T. (2025). The role of the workplace environment in shaping employees’ well-being. Sustainability, 17(6), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062613
Gozali, V. A., Zamralita, Z., & Lie, D. (2024). Workplace wellbeing and work engagement among Generation Z employees in PT X: The role of psychological capital as a moderator. Biopsikososial: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Mercubuana Jakarta, 8(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.22441/biopsikososial.v8i1.23750
Humaidah, A., & Mulyono, R. (2025). Adaptasi psychological well-being short scale pada mahasiswa. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(1), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v7i1.7990
Ibrahim, R. Z. A. R., Zalam, W. Z. M., Foster, B., Afrizal, T., Johansyah, M. D., Saputra, J., Bakar, A. A., Dagang, M. M., & Ali, S. N. M. (2021). Psychosocial work environment and teachers’ psychological well-being: The moderating role of job control and social support. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147308
Katz, I. M., Rauvola, R. S., & Rudolph, C. W. (2021). Feedback environment: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 29(3–4), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12350
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
Louro, E. S., & Gabardo-Martins, L. M. D. (2024). Psychometric properties of the Brazilian short scale of perceived feedback at work. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 34, e3421. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3421
Mopkins, D., Lee, M., & Malecha, A. (2024). Personal, social, and workplace environmental factors related to psychological well-being of staff in university settings. Workplace Health & Safety, 72(3), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/21650799231214249
Qi, Q., Liu, Y., & Liu, Z. (2023). Giving what they want: How congruence between expected feedback quality and delivered feedback quality influences leader-member exchange and job performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1115861
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 13–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0
Sparr, J. L., & Sonnentag, S. (2008). Feedback environment and well-being at work: The mediating role of personal control and feelings of helplessness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17(3), 388–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320802077146
Steelman, L. A., Levy, P. E., & Snell, A. F. (2004). The feedback environment scale: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403258440
