Amplifying Student Voice In Integrity Zone-Based University Complaint Systems

  • Ariatna Department of English Language and Literature, Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Rita Suswati Department of English Language and Literature, Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Juli Rachmadani Hasibuan Department of English Language and Literature, Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Yeni Erlita Department of English Language and Literature, Universitas Negeri Medan

Keywords

Integrity Zone, Complaint Handling, Student Voice, Procedural Justice, Higher

Abstract

The implementation of Integrity Zone initiatives in higher education emphasizes transparency, accountability, and service quality as key principles of good governance. However, the standardization of student complaint-handling systems within the Integrity Zone framework remains underexplored. This study investigates students’ needs for a standardized complaint-handling system in the Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia. Using a descriptive needs analysis approach as the preliminary stage of an ADDIE-based Research and Development (R&D) project, data were collected from 135 students, consisting of 81 English Education students and 54 English Literature students. The instrument included ten Likert-scale items and four open-ended questions. Quantitative findings revealed a substantial gap between existing complaint-handling practices and students’ expectations. The overall perception of the current system was moderate (M = 2.62, SD = 0.94). Low ratings were found for Information Transparency and Accessibility (M = 2.22, SD = 1.07), Procedural Certainty and Complaint Categorization (M = 2.29, SD = 1.00), and Complaint Resolution Effectiveness (M = 2.26, SD = 0.95). The lowest score was recorded for Safety and Procedural Protection (M = 1.97, SD = 0.98), indicating concerns regarding confidentiality and fear of academic retaliation. Conversely, students expressed very strong support for a standardized complaint-handling system (M = 4.38, SD = 0.70). Qualitative findings identified four key needs: anonymity protection, complaint tracking, procedural safeguards, and a web-based reporting platform. The findings provide an empirical foundation for developing an Integrity Zone-based SOP and digital complaint-management system to strengthen accountability, institutional trust, and service quality in higher education

References

Alex, A. O. I. (2023). An automated and robust tertiary institution web-based student complaint management system. International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology (IRJIET), 7(12), 110-124. https://doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2023.712016

Branch, R. M., & Dousay, T. A. (2021). Survey of instructional development models (6th ed.). Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT).

Braunack-Mayer, A. J., Street, J. M., Tooher, R., Feng, X., & Scharling-Gamba, K. (2020). Student and staff perspectives on the use of big data in the tertiary education sector: A scoping review and reflection on the ethical issues. Review of Educational Research, 90(6), 877–918. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320960213

Brown, J. D. (2021). Introducing needs analysis and English for specific purposes. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003022435

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

Douwes, R., Metselaar, J., Pijnenborg, G. H. M., & Boonstra, N. (2023). Well-being of students in higher education: The importance of a student perspective. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2190697. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2190697

Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 215–217. https://www.academia.edu/download/76605654/BBIJ-05-00149.pdf

Ferguson, G., & Phau, I. (2012). A cross‐national investigation of university students' complaining behaviour and attitudes to complaining. Journal of International Education in Business, 5(1), 50-70. https://doi.org/10.1108/18363261211261755

Główczewski, M., & Burdziej, S. (2023). (In)justice in academia: Procedural fairness, students' academic identification, and perceived legitimacy of university authorities. Higher Education, 86(1), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00907-8

Giannini, S. (2025). Reimagining the futures of education. Prospects, 5, 299-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-025-09740-0

Hart, D. J., & Coates, N. F. (2010). International student complaint behaviour: How do East Asian students complain to their university?. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34(3), 303-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2010.484051

Jones, M.-A., & Hall, V. (2022). Redefining student voice: Applying the lens of critical pragmatism. Oxford Review of Education, 48(5), 570–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2021.2003190

Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi (PANRB). (2021). Peraturan Menteri PANRB nomor 90 tahun 2021 tentang pembangunan dan evaluasi zona integritas menuju wilayah bebas dari korupsi dan wilayah birokrasi bersih dan melayani di instansi pemerintah. https://jdih.menpan.go.id/dokumen-hukum/peraturan-menteri-pendayagunaan-aparatur-negara-dan-reformasi-birokrasi-nomor-90-tahun-2021-tentang-1488

Matthews, K. E., & Dollinger, M. (2023). Student voice in higher education: The importance of distinguishing student representation and student partnership. Higher Education, 85(3), 555–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00851-7

Muh, I., Munirul, A., & Evra, W. (2023). Justice in handling complaints and its impact on satisfaction and loyalty in higher education. Перспективы науки и образования, 1(61), 24-39. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/justice-in-handling-complaints-and-its-impact-on-satisfaction-and-loyalty-in-higher-education

Oguntosin, V., Oluwadurotimi, M., Adoghe, A., Abdulkareem, A., & Adeyemi, G. (2021). Development of a web-based complaint management platform for a university community. Journal of Engineering Science & Technology Review, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.25103/jestr.141.17

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Ranu, M. E., Hermanto, F. Y., Susilowati, F. D., Fahmi, M. F., Amirusholihin, A., & Ramdhan, M. R. (2024). Implementation of integrity zones in educational institutions: Problems and readiness for innovation. International Journal of Emerging Research and Review, 2(4), 000090. https://doi.org/10.56707/ijoerar.v2i4.90

Resch, K. (2023). Student voice in higher education diversity policies: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1039578. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1039578

Ryan, T., Baik, C., & Larcombe, W. (2022). How can universities better support the mental wellbeing of higher degree research students? A study of students’ suggestions. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(3), 867-881. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1874886

Supriyanto, A., Burhanuddin, B., Sunarni, S., Rochmawati, R., Ratri, D. K., & Bhayangkara, A. N. (2025). Academic service quality, student satisfaction and loyalty: a study at higher education legal entities in Indonesia. The TQM Journal, 37(5), 1364-1384. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-10-2023-0334

Van Damme, D., & Zahner, D. (2022). Does higher education teach students to think critically? OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/cc9fa6aa-en

Watson, S., Lindsay, J., Kalogeropoulou, K., Proyer, M., & Scott-Hunt, S. (2016). A study of the effectiveness of using early resolution methods to resolve student complaints in Higher Education. https://researchinnovation.kingston.ac.uk/files/48218478/Watson-S-33996.pdf

Young, H., & Jerome, L. (2020). Student voice in higher education: Opening the loop. British Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 688–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3603

2026-09-05