Studi Literatur: Analisis Biaya-Efektivitas Program Promotif Dan Preventif

  • Bayu Pratama Departemen Akuntani, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Rahmat Yuliansyah Departemen Akuntani, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Krisnando Krisnando Departemen Akuntani, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Defi Damayanti Departemen Akuntani, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia

Keywords

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, Promotive, Preventive, Economic Evaluation, Primary Care, ICER

Abstract

Promotive and preventive health services serve as a cornerstone in alleviating the financial burden on both global and national health systems. This study aims to systematically review the literature regarding Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) of promotive and preventive programs. A narrative literature review was conducted on reputable scholarly articles evaluating the economics of interventions addressing non-communicable diseases (NCDs), stunting, and community health promotion programs. The findings indicate that investments in promotive and preventive interventions consistently yield Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs) that are far more efficient than curative-based treatments. Key barriers to implementation include a lack of long-term cost data and budget allocations that remain predominantly focused on curative services. The study concludes that strengthening financing allocations at the primary care level is a strategic step toward achieving sustainable health financing

References

Batura, N., Akseer, N., Gautham, M., Ahmed, S., Huq, S., & Skordis-Worrall, J. (2020). Economic evaluations of interventions to prevent or treat malnutrition in young children: A scoping review. BMC Public Health, 20(1), Article 1667. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09756-3

Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Claxton, K., Stoddart, G. L., & Torrance, G. W. (2015). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Augustovski, F., de Bekker-Grob, E., Briggs, A. H., Carswell, C., Caulley, L., Chaiyakunapruk, N., Greenberg, D., Loder, E., Mauskopf, J., Mullairathan, S., & Petrou, S. (2022). Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: Updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations. Value in Health, 25(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1351

Kemenkes RI. (2021). Pedoman evaluasi ekonomi kesehatan di Indonesia. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia.

Masters, R., Anwar, E., Collins, B., Cookson, R., & Capewell, S. (2017). Return on investment of public health interventions: A systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 71(8), 827–834. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2016-208141

World Health Organization. (2019). Saving lives, spending less: A high-level strategic roadmap to accelerate progress toward the NCD-related Sustainable Development Goal targets. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/311915

Xu, X., Zhang, X., & Mercer, D. (2021). Cost-effectiveness of lifestyle intervention and screening programs for non-communicable disease prevention in primary healthcare settings: A systematic review. Health Economics Review, 11(1), Article 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-021-00321-4

Yuniar, Y., & Raharni, R. (2020). Evaluasi biaya-efektivitas program skrining dan edukasi penyakit tidak menular di pelayanan kesehatan primer: Studi kasus Indonesia. Jurnal Kefarmasian Indonesia, 10(2), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.22435/jki.v10i2.3120

2026-09-05