STRATEGI MANAJEMEN PRIVASI DALAM KOMUNIKASI INTERPERSONAL PASANGAN BEDA KEYAKINAN DI KALANGAN GEN Z
Keywords
Manajemen Privasi, Komunikasi Interpersonal, Hubungan Beda Keyakinan,, Generasi Z, Communication Privacy ManagementAbstract
Hubungan berpacaran beda agama menjadi tantangan kompleks bagi Generasi Z di Indonesia sebagai negara dengan keberagaman agama yang tinggi. Perbedaan keyakinan tidak hanya melibatkan aspek spiritual, tetapi juga nilai keluarga, norma sosial, dan tekanan komunitas, sehingga memerlukan strategi komunikasi interpersonal yang adaptif untuk menjaga keharmonisan hubungan. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis strategi manajemen privasi dalam komunikasi interpersonal pasangan beda keyakinan di kalangan Gen Z.
Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan rancangan fenomenologi. Data primer dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam dan observasi partisipatif terhadap tiga pasangan mahasiswa FISIP UNMUL angkatan 2021 yang telah menjalin hubungan minimal satu tahun. Analisis data dilakukan dengan teknik reduksi data, penyajian data, dan verifikasi kesimpulan.
Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pasangan menerapkan tiga strategi utama, yaitu strategi selektif (paling dominan), strategi integrasi, dan strategi kompartementalisasi. Ketiga strategi ini digunakan untuk mengelola batas privasi, menghindari konflik, membangun nilai bersama, serta memisahkan ranah keyakinan pribadi dari hubungan romantis. Esensi pengalaman mereka adalah harmoni yang rapuh di tengah ketegangan antara keinginan keterbukaan dan perlindungan identitas religius.
Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa manajemen privasi melalui strategi komunikasi yang adaptif menjadi kunci keberlangsungan hubungan beda keyakinan pada Generasi Z di era digital.
References
[1] Puspitasari, A., and S. Handayani. “Dinamika Hubungan Lintas Agama dalam Masyarakat Majemuk Indonesia.” Jurnal Sosiologi Agama 12, no. 1 (2023): 23-41.
[2] Rahmat, S., and B. Sutrisno. “Fenomena Pacaran Beda Agama di Kalangan Pasangan Muda Gen Z: Analisis Dinamika Hubungan dan Faktor Penyebab.” Indonesian Journal of Social Research 6, no. 2 (2024): 112-128.
[3] Badan Pusat Statistik. Statistik Indonesia 2023. Jakarta: BPS, 2023.
[4] Setiawan, H. “Tantangan Komunikasi dalam Hubungan Lintas Agama di Indonesia.” Jurnal Studi Agama dan Masyarakat 18, no. 1 (2023): 89-108.
[5] Tamora, E., and P. Lombok. “Pengaruh Media Sosial terhadap Pola Komunikasi dan Hubungan Sosial dalam Kalangan Generasi Z.” Sanskara Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora 4, no. 2 (2024): 234-248.
[6] Cahya, R. “Stimulus Kultivasi pada Media Sosial dalam Mempengaruhi Kecenderungan Komunikasi Generasi Z.” Jurnal Komunikasi Digital 8, no. 1 (2025): 45-62.
[7] DeVito, J. A. The Interpersonal Communication Book. 15th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2019.
[8] Knapp, M. L., and A. L. Vangelisti. Interpersonal Communication and Human Relationships. 8th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2021.
[9] Sari, M., and A. Wijaya. “Strategi Komunikasi Pasangan yang Berpacaran Beda Agama dalam Menghadapi Tekanan Sosial.” Jurnal Komunikasi Interpersonal 9, no. 3 (2022): 156-172.
[10] Pratama, D. “Peran Media Sosial dalam Hubungan Romantis Generasi Z: Analisis Komunikasi Digital.” Jurnal Komunikasi Massa 15, no. 2 (2023): 78-95.
[11] Petronio, S. “Communication Boundary Management: A Theoretical Model of Managing Disclosure of Private Information between Marital Couples.” Communication Theory 1, no. 4 (1991): 311-335.
[12] Petronio, S. “Brief Status Report on Communication Privacy Management Theory.” Journal of Family Communication 13, no. 1 (2013): 6-14.
[13] Child, J. T., and S. Petronio. “Unpacking the Paradoxes of Privacy in CMC Relationships: The Challenges of Blogging and Relational Communication on the Internet.” In Computer-Mediated Communication in Personal Relationships, edited by K. B. Wright and L. M. Webb, 21-40. New York: Peter Lang, 2011.
[14] Durham, W. T. “The Rules-Based Process of Revealing/Concealing the Family Planning Decisions of Voluntarily Child-Free Couples: A Communication Privacy Management Perspective.” Communication Studies 59, no. 2 (2008): 132-147.
[15] Djafarova, E., and T. Bowes. “‘Instagram Made Me Buy It’: Generation Z Impulse Purchases in Fashion Industry.” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 59 (2021): 102345.
[16] Mascheroni, G., J. Vincent, and E. Jimenez. “‘Girls Are Addicted to Likes So They Post Semi-Naked Selfies’: Peer Mediation, Normativity and the Construction of Identity Online.” Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 9, no. 1 (2015): article 5.
[17] Petronio, S., and J. T. Child. “Conceptualization and Operationalization: Utility of Communication Privacy Management Theory.” Current Opinion in Psychology 31 (2020): 76-82.
[18] Child, J. T., S. Petronio, E. A. Agyeman-Budu, and D. A. Westermann. “Blog Scrubbing: Exploring Triggers That Change Privacy Rules.” Computers in Human Behavior 27, no. 5 (2011): 2017-2027.
[19] Petronio, S. Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure. Albany: SUNY Press, 2002.
[20] Waters, R. D., and J. M. Ackerman. “Exploring Privacy Management on Facebook: Motivations and Perceived Consequences of Voluntary Disclosure.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17, no. 1 (2011): 101-115.
[21] Sharma, A., and R. Singh. “Interfaith Unions: Understanding the Dynamics, Acceptance, and Resilience of Interfaith Couples.” International Journal of Social and Humanities Research 9, no. 2 (2024): 85-94.
[22] DeVito, J. A. The Interpersonal Communication Book. 14th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2016.
[23] Gottman, J. M., and R. W. Levenson. “The Timing of Divorce: Predicting When a Couple Will Divorce over a 14-Year Period.” Journal of Marriage and Family 62, no. 3 (2000): 737-745.
[24] Guerrero, L. K., P. A. Andersen, and W. A. Afifi. Close Encounters: Communication in Relationships. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2017.
[25] Davis, M. H. Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach. New York: Routledge, 2018.
[26] Worthington, E. L., D. E. Davis, and J. N. Hook, eds. Handbook of Humility: Theory, Research, and Applications. New York: Routledge, 2017.
[27] Pearce, W. B., and V. E. Cronen. Communication, Action, and Meaning: The Creation of Social Realities. New York: Praeger, 1980.
[28] Baxter, L. A., and B. M. Montgomery. Relating: Dialogues and Dialectics. New York: Guilford Press, 1996.
[29] Reis, H. T., and P. Shaver. “Intimacy as an Interpersonal Process.” In Handbook of Personal Relationships, edited by S. Duck, 367-389. Chichester: Wiley, 1988.
[30] Derlega, V. J., B. A. Winstead, and K. Greene. “Self-Disclosure and Starting a Close Relationship.” In Handbook of Relationship Initiation, edited by S. Sprecher, A. Wenzel, and J. Harvey, 153-174. New York: Psychology Press, 2008.
[31] Sillars, A. L., and J. Weisberg. “Conflict as a Social Skill.” In Interpersonal Processes: New Directions in Communication Research, edited by M. E. Roloff and G. R. Miller, 140-171. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1987.
[32] Thomas, K. W., and R. H. Kilmann. Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. Tuxedo, NY: Xicom, 1974.
[33] Mehrabian, A. Silent Messages. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1971.
[34] Knapp, M. L., J. A. Hall, and T. G. Horgan. Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction. 8th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning, 2013.
[35] Hall, J. A., S. Carter, M. J. Cody, and J. M. Albright. “Individual Differences in the Communication of Romantic Interest: Development of the Flirting Styles Inventory.” Communication Quarterly 58, no. 4 (2010): 365-393.
[36] Giles, H., and P. F. Powesland. Speech Style and Social Evaluation. London: Academic Press, 1975.
[37] Gallois, C., T. Ogay, and H. Giles. “Communication Accommodation Theory: A Look Back and a Look Ahead.” In Theorizing about Intercultural Communication, edited by W. B. Gudykunst, 121-148. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2005.
[38] Moore, D. L. Overcoming Religious Illiteracy: A Cultural Studies Approach to the Study of Religion in Secondary Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
[39] Mahoney, A., K. I. Pargament, N. Tarakeshwar, and A. B. Swank. “Religion in the Home in the 1980s and 1990s: A Meta-Analytic Review and Conceptual Analysis of Links between Religion, Marriage, and Parenting.” Journal of Family Psychology 15, no. 4 (2001): 559-596.
[40] Seemiller, C., and M. Grace. Generation Z: A Century in the Making. New York: Routledge, 2019.
[41] Mahoney, A. “Religion in Families, 1999-2009: A Relational Spirituality Framework.” Journal of Marriage and Family 72, no. 4 (2010): 805-827.
[42] Ellison, C. G., A. M. Burdette, and W. B. Wilcox. “The Couple That Prays Together: Race and Ethnicity, Religion, and Relationship Quality among Working-Age Adults.” Journal of Marriage and Family 72, no. 4 (2010): 963-975.
[43] Pargament, K. I., and A. Mahoney. “Sacred Matters: Sanctification as a Vital Topic for the Psychology of Religion.” International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 15, no. 3 (2005): 179-198.
[44] Call, V. R. A., and T. B. Heaton. “Religious Influence on Marital Stability.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 36, no. 3 (1997): 382-392.
[45] Seemiller, C., and M. Grace. Generation Z Goes to College. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2016.
[46] Twenge, J. M. iGen: Why Today’s Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy—and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood. New York: Atria Books, 2017.
[47] Parker, K., and R. Igielnik. “On the Cusp of Adulthood and Facing an Uncertain Future: What We Know about Gen Z So Far.” Pew Research Center, 2020.
[48] Francis, T., and F. Hoefel. “‘True Gen’: Generation Z and Its Implications for Companies.” McKinsey & Company, 2018.
[49] Dimock, M. “Defining Generations: Where Millennials End and Generation Z Begins.” Pew Research Center, 2019.
[50] Tynan, D. “Generation Z and Romantic Relationships: Digital Natives Navigate Love in the 21st Century.” Journal of Youth Studies 24, no. 6 (2021): 789-805.
[51] Sugiyono. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2022.
[52] Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. 2nd ed. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2021.
[53] Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. 4th ed. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2023.
[54] Creswell, J. W. Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2016.
[55] Guest, G., A. Bunce, and L. Johnson. “How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability.” Field Methods 18, no. 1 (2006): 59-82.
[56] Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Untuk Penelitian yang Bersifat Eksploratif, Interpretif, Interaktif, dan Konstruktif. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2020.
