NAVIGATING THE STAGES OF CULTURE SHOCK: ASIAN ERASMUS+ STUDENTS’ EXPERIENCES OF STUDYING ABROAD IN EUROPE

Authors

  • Rizqi Kurniawan Tribowo LSPR Institute Communication and Business
  • Joe Harrianto Setiawan LSPR Institute Communication and Business

Keywords:

Culture Shock, Erasmus , Asian Students, Study Abroad, Intercultural Adaptation, Qualitative Research

Abstract

International student mobility has become a central feature of higher education internationalization, offering opportunities for intercultural learning while also exposing students to cultural challenges. This study explores how Asian Erasmus+ students experience and navigate culture shock during their study abroad experience in Europe. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, the research draws on in-depth interviews with Asian exchange students who participated in Erasmus+ mobility programs across various European host countries. Data were analyzed thematically using a stages of culture shock framework, encompassing honeymoon, disintegration, reintegration, adjustment, and adaptation.

The findings reveal that culture shock among Asian Erasmus+ students unfolds as a dynamic and non-linear process rather than a fixed sequence of stages. Initial enthusiasm and idealized expectations during the honeymoon stage gradually give way to confusion related to academic autonomy, communication norms, and everyday social practices. This is followed by cultural frustration and identity negotiation, as students critically compare host and home cultures. Over time, participants develop coping strategies that support adjustment and autonomy, leading to functional adaptation and intercultural competence. Importantly, adaptation is found to be context-dependent and pragmatic, reflecting the time-limited nature of short-term exchange programs rather than complete cultural assimilation.

This study contributes to intercultural communication and international education literature by reaffirming the relevance of the culture shock framework while highlighting its flexibility in short-term mobility contexts. The findings underscore the need for stage-sensitive institutional support and culturally responsive academic practices to enhance international students’ study abroad experiences. The study offers practical implications for universities and mobility program coordinators seeking to foster inclusive and supportive international learning environments

References

Adler, P. S. (1975). The transitional experience: An alternative view of culture shock. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 15(4), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/002216787501500403

Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x

Brown, L., & Holloway, I. (2008). The adjustment journey of international postgraduate students at an English university: An ethnographic study. Journal of Research in International Education, 7(2), 232–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240908091306

Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002

Demes, K. A., & Geeraert, N. (2015). The highs and lows of a cultural transition: A longitudinal analysis of sojourner stress and adaptation across 50 countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(2), 316–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000046

Endes, J. (2015). Erasmus mobility and employability: The impact of international study experiences on graduates’ careers. European Journal of Education, 50(4), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12139

Erbaş, A. (2013). Multiculturalism and intercultural communication: An educational perspective. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 34(3), 310–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2013.781983

Ernofalina. (2017). Culture shock experienced by Indonesian students studying abroad. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

European Commission. (2023). Erasmus+ programme guide. Brussels: European Union.

European Migration Network. (2023). Annual report on migration and asylum in Europe. Brussels: European Commission.

Evans, C. (2015). International experiences and graduate employability. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(2), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-05-2014-0065

Gudykunst, W. B., & Kim, Y. Y. (2003). Communicating with strangers: An approach to intercultural communication (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Kim, Y. Y. (2001). Becoming intercultural: An integrative theory of communication and cross-cultural adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Lambert, V. A., & Lambert, C. E. (2013). Qualitative descriptive research: An acceptable design. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 16(4), 255–256.

Lott, B. (2010). Multiculturalism and diversity: A social psychological perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 66(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01628.x

Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology (MOECRT). (2022). Indonesian International Student Mobility Awards (IISMA) program handbook. Jakarta: MOECRT.

Naylor, L. (1997). Culture and change: An introduction. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.

Noraini, M., Nur Sofurah, M. F., & Aini, A. (2014). Intercultural communication competence in higher education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.263

OECD. (2020). Internationalisation and global engagement in higher education. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Oberg, K. (1960). Cultural shock: Adjustment to new cultural environments. Practical Anthropology, 7, 177–182.

Pacheco, R. (2020). Intercultural competence in globalized education. Journal of International Education Research, 16(2), 55–64.

Pedersen, P. B. (1995). The five stages of culture shock: Critical incidents around the world. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

Poyrazli, S., & Lopez, M. D. (2007). An exploratory study of perceived discrimination and homesickness: A comparison of international students and American students. Journal of Psychology, 141(3), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.141.3.263-280

Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., & McDaniel, E. R. (2010). Communication between cultures (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth.

Salisbury, M. H. (2013). Study abroad and intercultural competence. Journal of College Student Development, 54(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2013.0006

Spitzberg, B. H., & Changnon, G. (2009). Conceptualizing intercultural competence. In D. K. Deardorff (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence (pp. 2–52). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Taft, R. (1977). Coping with unfamiliar cultures. In N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 121–153). London: Academic Press.

Tiechuan, L. (2016). Cross-cultural communication in global contexts. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 45(3), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2016.1182472

West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2010). Introducing communication theory: Analysis and application (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Zhou, Y., Jindal-Snape, D., Topping, K., & Todman, J. (2008). Theoretical models of culture shock and adaptation in international students. Studies in Higher Education, 33(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701794833

Downloads

Published

2026-02-04

How to Cite

Rizqi Kurniawan Tribowo, & Joe Harrianto Setiawan. (2026). NAVIGATING THE STAGES OF CULTURE SHOCK: ASIAN ERASMUS+ STUDENTS’ EXPERIENCES OF STUDYING ABROAD IN EUROPE. Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 5(9), 10581–10596. Retrieved from https://mail.bajangjournal.com/index.php/JIRK/article/view/12320