KEPASTIAN HUKUM AKTA HIBAH YANG DIBATALKAN OLEH PENGADILAN AGAMA AKIBAT WANPRESTASI
Keywords:
Legal Certainty, Deed Of Grant, DefaultAbstract
The grant, as a legal act of a unilateral and irrevocable nature, requires the existence of conformity between the will of the benefactor and the donee and the fulfillment of the formal provisions in force. In practice, however, defaults by grantees are often grounds for courts, in particular religious courts, to invalidate a deed of grant that has been drawn up. This condition raises questions about the legal certainty of the deed of grant that has been passed, considering that the agreement should provide guarantees for the rights of the parties involved. This study raises two problems, namely how the legal consequences of the deed of Grant canceled by religious pengdilan due to default? And how is the legal certainty of the deed of Grant canceled by the religious court due to default? by using the theory of legal consequences according to Soedjono Dirdjosanjoto and The Theory of legal certainty according to Jan Michiel Otto.
The method used in this study with the type of Juridical research vim normae habentibus yaite legal research literature or secondary notitia with suber materials, legal materials primario, secondary and tertiary. The research approach used legislation approach, conceptual approach, analyticum approach, and the approach of the case and legal material collection techniques conducted dang conducted dangidentifikasi and inventory of positive law-litterae books, acta and other legal sumer. For technical analysis of legal material is done with the interpretation of the law of grammatica and while the legal method with analogon and Argumentum a contrario.
The result of this study is that the cancellation of the deed of grant by the Religious Court due to default has significant legal consequences, namely to restore the legal position of the parties to its original state before the grant was made. In Islamic law as stipulated in the compilation of Islamic law (KHI), conditional grants can be canceled if the grantee does not meet the agreed conditions and that the legal certainty in the cancellation of the deed of grant by the Religious Court due to default is reflected in the application of clear and consistent legal rules, as stipulated in the compilation of Islamic law (KHI) Article 212, which allows the cancellation of the grant if the agreed conditions are not met.
From the research results, it can be seen that in the price determination collection by the Regional Financial Management Agency (BPKD) in determining the value of buying and selling transactions, it is based on the currently applicable Regional Laws and Regulations, while the Regent's regulations regarding Land Value Zone Estimates in the imposition of BPHTB in determining Transaction Values, these regulations serve as a comparison in the data verification process in the field.
References
Arimurti, dkk. Perspektif terhadap Pembatalan Akta Hibah Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah atas Hibah yang Tidak Diberikan Secara Cuma-Cuma (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Kalianda, Nomor 31/Pdt.G/2020/PN KLA). Jurnal Pakuan Law Review, Volume 08, Nomor 01, Januari-Juni 2022.
Dirdjosanjoto, Soedjono. Prinsip Keadilan dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa di Pengadilan Agama. Jurnal Hukum Islam, Vol. 3, No. 2, UII, Jogyakarta 2008.
Dirdjosanjoto, Soedjono. Wanprestasi dan Akibat Hukumnya. Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2000.
H.A. Djazim Ma’shum, Penyelesaian Sengketa Hibah Tanah Di Pengadilan Agama Kraksaan (Studi Di Pengadilan Agama Kraksaan Perkara Nomor: 2308/Pdt.G/2016/Pa. Krs), Justness Jurnal Hukum Politik dan Agama, Vol. 2 No. 01, Maret 2022.
Harsono, Boedi, Hukum Agraria Indonesia: Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Isi dan Pelaksanaannya, Djambatan, Jakarta, 2005.
Lidya Christina Wardhani, Tanggung Jawab Notaris/PPAT terhadap Akta yang Dibatalkan oleh Pengadilan, Jurnal LexRennaisance, Vol. 2 No. 1 Januari 2017.
Meylita Stansya Rosalina Oping, Pembatalan Hibah Menurut Pasal 1688 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, Jurnal Lex Privatum, Vol.5 Nomor 7, 2017.
Nurul Wafiqah Ashar, Kedudukan Akta Peralihan Hibah Terhadap Bagian Mutlak Ahli Waris, Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG), Vol.2, No.4.
R. Wirjono Prodjodikoro, AzazAzaz Hukum Perjanjian, Penerbit Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2012.
Ria Sintha Devi, Analisis Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Hibah Di Pengadilan Tinggi Medan (Studi Kasus Putusan No.142/PDT/2015/PTMDN), Jurnal Darma Agung Volume 29, Nomor 1, April 2021.
Soeroso, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Pt. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2011.
Subekti, R, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata, Intermasa, Jakarta, 2002.
Sudikno Mertokusumo, Hukum Perdata Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 2007.
Wijaya, Danu, Implikasi Pembatalan Hibah terhadap Hak Atas Tanah. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Kenotariatan, 18(4), 2020.
Wirjono Prodjodikoro, Hukum Perdata Tentang Perjanjian Tertentu, PT. Intermasa, Jakarta, 2021.
Yahya Harahap, M, Hukum Acara Perdata: Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2005.
Zainuddin, Ahmad, Keabsahan Akta Hibah dalam Perspektif Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 10(2), 2022.
Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (UUD 1945);
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata;
Kompilasi hukum Islam (KHI)
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria (UUPA).
Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) Nomor 24 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 37 Tahun 1998 Tentang Peraturan Jabatan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah.
Peraturan Menteri Agraria/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 3 Tahun 1997 tentang Ketentuan Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah disebutkan bahwa akta PPAT.
Yurisprudensi
Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 765/Pdt.G/2015/PA Sgm.
Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 61/Pdt.G/2014/PA Br.
Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 1050/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Sel.
