AGENT AND STRUCTURE RELATIONS IN THE COMMUNICATION PROCESS BASED ON HUMANIST AND RELIGIOUS VALUES AT THE PAMULANG UNIVERSITY IN SOUTH TANGERANG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53625/ijss.v3i6.7634Keywords:
Agent, Structure, Communication, Humanist, ReligiousAbstract
Pamulang University (Unpam), one of the private universities in the South Tangerang area, is established to meet the needs of the community by providing its own uniqueness and receiving very good interest. The uniqueness meant by that is the history of its founding to provide higher education for all people, especially for those people mentioned, the increase and large quantity of registered students, the availability of classes for students with disabilities, adequate lecture facilities, affordable tuition fees, and no building costs. One of the successes that has been achieved to date is the contribution of lecturers in implementing the tridharma of higher education. This is where the lecturer acts as an agent, actor, or agency, as known in Anthony Giddens' structuration theory. As a form of routine that produces social practice, the lecturer's tridharma must reflect humanist and religious values, including in the communication process within the university. These two values are in accordance with those stated in the university's vision, namely, "To become a university ranked in the top 40 at the national level based on humanist and religious values by 2025." This article analyzes the relationship between agents and structures in the communication process based on humanist and religious values at a private university in South Tangerang. The research used a qualitative method with a critical theory paradigm and an interpretive phenomenological approach. The results show that Unpam is able to manage and strive to pursue its vision through the tridharma of higher education, with the contribution of lecturers who act as agents, actors, and agencies. The routine activities of agents form a duality of structure and are related by mutual influence and reciprocity (interplay) that reflect most of the implementation of both humanist and religious values. Forms of communication that are full of humanist values, such as when lecturers greet each other, provide non-differentiating classroom learning, and interact with students and the community in PkM activities, including coordinating work on research activities, Meanwhile, religiousness can be seen in the form of greeting words and sentences, praying before and after activities, religious attributes worn as characteristics, tolerance during worship, the formation of the Institute for Religious Studies, and also religious studies. On the other hand, the role of agents still needs to be optimized as gatekeepers and/or opinion leaders because, as educators, they provide role models, especially for students (predominantly from the marginalized and lower middle class) and also the general public. Meanwhile, the university needs to have an organizational culture to strengthen motivation for academics, direction, and foundation in behavior and attitudes, which can be taken from humanist and religious values, as well as the motto Sharing for the Country, alongside the implementation of a code of ethics, to help realize its vision in 2025
References
Altamira, Melisa B., Rusfian, Effy. (2019) "Komunikasi Organisasi Dalam Proses Pembentukan Budaya Organisasi (Studi Nilai Budaya Organisasi I’ve Care Pada Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia)," Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Terapan: Vol. 2: Iss. 1, Article 5
Creswell, John W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, evaluating, quantitative and qualitative research (Fourth Edition). United State of America: Pearson Education Inc.
D. Susilo, K Rachmad. (2008). 20 Tokoh Sosiologi Modern. Yogyakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Giddens, A. (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Contemporary Social Theory. MacMillan Education, LTD.
Giddens, A. (1981) A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Power Property and the State. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press. Giddens, A. (2011). The Constitution of Society: Teori Strukturasi untuk Analisis Sosial. Penerjemah Adi Loka Sujono. Pedati
Giddens, Anthony. (2016). (Terjemahan: Maufur dan Daryanto). Teori Strukturasi: Dasar-dasar Pembentukan Struktur Sosial. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Liliweri. Alo. (2014). Sosiologi & Komunikasi Organisasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Liliweri, A. (2019). Pengantar Studi Kebudayaan. Nusamedia.
Mulyana, Deddy. (2013). Komunikasi Organisasi: Strategi Meningkatkan Kinerja Perusahaan. Bandung: PT Rosdakarya.
Nasution, M. F., et al. (2015). "Shaping of Security Policy In An Indonesian Bank: Interpreting Institutionalization And Structuration. Kinerja: Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–15.
Pace, R. Wayne, and Faules, Don F. (2018). Komunikasi Organisasi (Strategi Meningkatkan Kinerja Perusahaan). PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.
P. Lambe, Kristian H. (2018). Analisis Strukturasi Politisi Toraja Dipanggung Politik Sulawesi Selatan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional 2018 Sinergitas Multidisiplin Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi, vol. 1, 2018, Hal. 346-357.
Setyana, F. O. R., & Aruman, A. E. (2021). Peran Komunikasi Internal Dalam Pencapaian Visi dan Penanaman Nilai Perusahaan Crediton Group Indonesia. COMMENTATE: Journal of Communication Management, 2(1), 33–48. Retrieved from https://journal.lspr.edu/index.php/commentate/article/view/253
Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Untuk penelitian yang bersifat eksploratif, interpretif, interaktif, dan konstruktif. Edisi ketiga, January 2020. Bandung: Alfabeta
Suminar, Panji. (2020). Relasi Agen dan Struktur: Ruang Negosiasi dalam Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Hutan di Kabupaten Lebong. Jurnal Sosiologi Nusantara, Vol. 6, No. 1.
Widihastuti, Rahma A. (2019). Dualitas Struktur dan Agen dalam Cerpen “Kabut Neraka” Karya Danarto: Analisis Teori Strukturasi Anthony Giddens. EUFONI (Vol. 3, No. 2. http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/EFN/article/view/5258/3736
Yudha, Reza Praditya. (2020). Atta Halilintar: Agen Strukturisasi Karir Generasi-Z. Jurnal Lontar Volume.8 Nomor 2 Edisi Juli-Desember 2020. https://e-jurnal.lppmunsera.org/index.php/LONTAR/article/view/1598/1551
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Surti Wardani, Alo Liliweri, Ridzki Rinanto Sigit

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.