AUTHORITIES OF CIVIL SERVANT INVESTIGATES IN CONDUCTING INVESTIGATIONS ON ACTS OF CORPORATE MALADMINISTRATION IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACCORDING TO LAW NO. 36 OF 1999 CONCERNING TELECOMMUNICATIONS ADJUSTED TO THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGAL CERTAINTY

Abdul Hayy Nasution; Edi Setiadi; Yeti Sumiati

doi:10.53625/ijss.v2i5.4952

Authors

Abdul Hayy Nasution Faculty of Law, Bandung Islamic University, Indonesia
Edi Setiadi Faculty of Law, Bandung Islamic University, Indonesia
Yeti Sumiati Faculty of Law, Bandung Islamic University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53625/ijss.v2i5.4952

Keywords:

Civil Servant, Investigation, Maladministration, Law No. 36 Of 1999, Legal Certainty

Abstract

This research was conducted to find out how the laws and regulations regulate PPNS Authority in conducting investigations of corporate maladministration in the telecommunications sector, then regarding the Implementation of PPNS Authority in conducting investigations or corporate maladministration actions in the field of telecommunications, and find out how the PPNS authority mechanism to conduct maladministration investigations telecommunications sector corporations on the principle of legal certainty. This study uses a normative juridical approach, namely by examining theories, concepts, legal principles and laws and regulations and using the preparation of analytical descriptive research specifications, and the data used are primary, secondary, and tertiary. The results of this study are that PPNS is obliged to notify the investigation to Polri investigators. in the form of tactical assistance, technical assistance, coercive assistance and investigative consulting assistance. The case files must be submitted to the Prosecutor, in accordance with Article 110 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the submission is carried out through Polri investigators in accordance with Article 107 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code

References

Abdul Latif, Hukum Administrasi (Dalam Praktik Tindak Pidana Korupsi), Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2014.

Barda Nawawi Arief, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1996.

BPKP, Deputi Bidang Investigasi, Pedoman Penugasan Bidang Investigasi, Jakarta, 2009.

Dalam Pasal 14, Undang-undang No. 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM)

Dalam Pasal 2, Undang-undang No. 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM)

GEA, ALBIN RAJANI. "Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Penyalahgunaan Alat Penyiar Spektrum Frekuensi Radio Tanpa Izin (Studi Putusan Nomor: 10/PID. SUS/2018/PN. Pti)."

https://economy.okezone.com/read/2013/02/20/278/764936/kasus-indosat-im2-dinilai-bukan-perkara-pidan

Kasus Indar Atmanto, dalam Putusan Kasasi No. 787 K/Pid.Sus/2014

_________________, dalam putusan No. 01/PIDSUS/2013/PN.JKT.PST.

________________ , dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat No. 01/PID.Sus/2013PN.JKT.PST

_________________, dalam Putusan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Tata Usaha Negara dengan Nomor Perkara: 263K/TUN/2014.

Malayu S.P Hasibuan, 2008, Manajemen: Dasar, Pengertian, dan Masalah. Edisi Revisi. Cetakan Ketujuh, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Nasution, Abdul Hayy, and I. Gusti Ayu Anita Lakshana. "Kewenangan Penyidik Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PPNS) dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana pada Pasal 1 Ayat (1) Jo. Pasal 6 Ayat (1) dan Undang-Undang No. 19 Tahun 2019 tentang Tindak Pidana Korupsi pada Pasal 1 Ayat (6) dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana Indonesia." FOCUS 3.2 (2022).

Philipus M. Hadjon, dkk, Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta, 2008.

Risalah sidang perkara nomor 4/PUU-XX/20221, perihal: “PENGUJIAN MATERIIL UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1981 TENTANG HUKUM ACARA PIDANA TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945”

Shidarta, Hukum Penalaran dan Penalaran Hukum, Cet. I, Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2013.

W.J.S Poerwadarminta, 2002, Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta : Balai Pustaka,